Latest analysis
Korea – from selling to buying
Today's BOP data show that after selling more than USD30bn of domestic equities in June, foreigners purchased USD6bn in July. That swing goes a long way to explain the sudden appreciation of the KRW. That should be able to continue, given CA surplus of over 20% of GDP, strong economy, and BOK hikes.
Region – Japan leading
The PMIs show Japan's manufacturing cycle is the strongest in the region. That might be because the measures in Taiwan and Korea struggle to capture the macro impact of chip strength. Even so, it is still an important take-away, especially when the PMIs show Japan also leads in price strength.
Japan – mfg mini-boom
Defying BOJ fears of a slowdown, this year's surge in corporate profits continued in Q2. The big driver this year has been manufacturing, and today's PMI shows the recovery in the sector isn't over yet. Relative to the strength of profits, capex and wages are sluggish.
Korea – strong July
Output in July retained the gains of June, and capex spending rose further. Both suggest a strong start for GDP in Q3. Retail sales were weaker last month, but the household sector should start to benefit as the government spends the 20% growth in tax revenue of recent months.
China – no change
The PMIs continue to show no economic cycle. Construction activity continues to drop, but the manufacturing PMI continues to hover around the 50 mark. Input prices have rebounded again, so this year's recovery in PPI isn't ending just yet. None of these changes point to a shift in policy.
Korea – "pre-emptive"
Today's BOK meeting didn't throw up any big surprises: core CPI and growth forecasts were raised against the backdrop of the TOT shock, and the bank hiked again with the aim of being "pre-emptive". However, Governor Shin's remarks at the press conference produced a lot to digest.
Japan – Himino hawkish
Deputy governor Himino's argued today that all the main macro dynamics are pushing up prices, underlying inflation has been rising, and so there is now a risk of "underlying inflation exceeding 2%". Unsurprisingly, he didn't spell out the policy implications, but it does sound quite hawkish, no?