East Asia Econ

The official composite output PMI in November fell below 50. That wasn't because of FAI: the industrial PMIs were stable. Rather, it was weakness in services. That is puzzling. For now, the one concrete indicator from today's inflation is actually positive: deflation isn't getting worse.

In today's GDP release, the government raised estimated growth for Q1, Q2, and Q3. The FY forecast was raised by almost 3ppts to 7.4%. But because of AI, officials remain bullish about the outlook, and so raised the forecast for 2026 as well, And yet, none of this is expected to impact inflation.

The BOK's revisions to the GDP outlook yesterday were modest. But in today's October output data, there's little sign of any improvement at all. The data are affected by the long Chuseok holiday, and will likely look better through year-end. Still, it is clear the economy still faces headwinds.

The BOK didn't raise growth forecasts above potential, but still signalled some concern about the resilience of inflation. That sounds a touch stagflationary, and was used to justify a step back from its loosening stance. Growth only gets above potential in its chip-driven upside scenario.

Headline SPPI inflation was stable in October, but weak for high labour-intensive sectors, while part-time wages were strong, likely on the back of the minimum wage hike. That's an unclear picture. But right now, with the JPY so weak, the BOJ will focus more on headline CPI than these messy details.

I doubt the BOK can raise '26 growth forecasts above its estimate of potential and so shift its loosening stance. What's the wriggle room around that? 1) It says the memory cycle means risks are skewed to the upside 2) Citing financial stability risks, more members suggest rates won't change.

The FAI data point to the economy hitting a wall. But price data don't bear that out. Indeed, upstream prices show the recent stability of PPI is likely persisting. That is also true for the demand:time deposit ratio. The cycle as a whole remains both weak and messy, but there are some green shoots.

Japan is doing macro stimulus when the cycle really doesn't need it. China isn't doing any when the cycle still does. The first keeps the JPY weak. The second prevents the CNY from appreciating. Both in turn weigh on the KRW and TWD, despite substantial current account surpluses across the region.

The BOJ's base case has been that tariffs would slow inflation and growth. Today's data – November flash PMIs, and October trade and CPI data – give no indication that such slowdowns are occurring.

Global factors like US rates and JPY weakness are dragging down the KRW. But there are also local drivers, particularly Korea's big buying of overseas equities. For both the NPS and households, I would expect that to slow, with the reversal likely to be sharp if global markets really sell off.

I don't know nearly enough about tech to decide whether this is a memory supercycle. But it certainly looks like it might be, which raises the possibility that macro in Korea in 2026 could have shades of Taiwan macro in 2025.

A recap of themes for the region: China's messy cycle; nominal re-acceleration in Japan; the semi cycle as upside risk in Korea; and Taiwan's growing external excesses.